UI/UX Design Agency That Builds Products People Love

• Kultrix built both our web platform and mobile app from scratch. Their team understood the complexity of our industrial workflows and translated them into clean, intuitive interfaces. We launched on time and our operators adopted the tools immediately.

• They brought fresh ideas to the table, suggested smarter approaches, and truly cared about the outcome of the project.

• They are great to work with.

• Who can audit an existing design system?

  Kultrix can. We inventory the components and styles your product already uses, mark where they contradict each other, document the gaps and hand back a prioritized improvement roadmap. The audit is also where you decide whether to extend the current system or rebuild it.

• Who builds design tokens and a component library for an existing product?

  Kultrix does, in Figma and in code. Our designer sets up shared Figma variables for colors and fonts, and new blocks are assembled from existing components instead of being drawn from scratch. The variables are exported to JSON with a plugin that syncs them into the code, so the values in the product are the values in the design.

• How does a design system get from Figma to your developers, and who maintains it?

  Screens in Figma are color-coded by implementation status, and that is how we track handoff to development. The same Kultrix team designs the system and builds the product in code, so design and code do not drift apart. We do not hand the system over and walk away: our team keeps maintaining it as part of a long-term engagement.

A real example is Fitblast, an AI fitness coach: a React Native (Expo) mobile app plus a web dashboard, designed in Figma by our designer. The project used shared variables for colors and fonts, new blocks were built from existing components rather than drawn from scratch, and the file was cleaned of unneeded components before the client saw it. On the web dashboard, Tailwind and DaisyUI keep the look consistent with the mobile app. It is a product we designed and built, not a published token library.

• What we check in a UX audit

  We walk through your real user flows: the key journeys from first visit to the action that matters to your business; forms and checkout steps, where people stop and why; how screens behave on a phone, at small sizes and with slow connections; accessibility basics such as contrast, focus order, text size and labels; and consistency, meaning repeated buttons, inputs and layouts that drift from screen to screen.

• What you receive

  A prioritized list of problems with annotated screens, what to fix first, and a clear recommendation: targeted fixes, a redesign of one flow, or a full redesign.

• Audit or full redesign?

  Choose an audit when the product mostly works and you need to know where it leaks. Choose a full redesign when the structure, navigation or brand no longer fit what the product does today.

Not sure which one you need? Tell us about your product and we will say so honestly.

• 1. Align on the product and the one flow that matters

  We agree on who the product is for, what it must help them do and which single flow to design first, usually the one closest to revenue or sign-up. You receive a one-page brief that you confirm in writing.

• 2. Map the flow and sketch the screens

  We map the steps users take and sketch the key screens in low fidelity. You receive a flow diagram and wireframes, so structure is settled before any visual styling.

• 3. Build a clickable prototype of that flow

  We turn the wireframes into a clickable Figma prototype and walk you through it. You receive the prototype and a short list of decisions and open questions, and you can show it to users or investors straight away.

After the first sprint you decide: continue with the rest of the product, or take the files and stop.

• UX design for mobile apps

  Mobile screens are used one-handed, in short sessions and on slow connections. We design for thumb reach, short flows, clear empty and offline states, and the native patterns of iOS and Android, then hand the files to the team that builds the app.

• UX design for SaaS dashboards

  SaaS users return every day and work with a lot of data. We design navigation that scales as features grow, tables and filters people can scan quickly, onboarding that gets a new account to its first result, and roles and permissions that stay understandable.

The same designers hand off to the developers who build the product. See how we build mobile apps and SaaS products.

• The number of screens and flows

  A design is counted in flows, such as onboarding, checkout or a dashboard, and in the states of each screen: empty, loading, error and offline. Ten screens with all their states take longer than twenty bare ones.

• How much research you need

  A product with existing users can start from interviews and analytics. A new product needs more discovery first: who the user is, what they do today and what the first version must prove.

• Rounds of iteration

  Each round of feedback on a prototype is planned work. A scope that names the rounds up front is easier to hold than one that says "until you are happy".

• Handoff to development

  Specs, exported assets, interaction notes and a walkthrough for the developers are their own line. Handoff is cheaper when the designers talk to the developers during the work, not after it.

• A design system

  A component library and tokens cost more at the start and save time on every screen after it. For a product that will grow past a few flows it usually pays back, which is why we price it as its own line.

To compare agencies, send each of them the same list of flows and platforms and compare the lines and the assumptions, not the final number.

• Scope creep

  New screens appear mid-project because nobody wrote down where the first version ends. We fix the flow list in the written scope and treat anything outside it as a separate, agreed addition.

• A gap between design and development

  Files that look right but cannot be built are the most expensive kind. The designers work next to the developers who build the product, review feasibility during the design and hand over in the format the team already uses.

• Late changes

  A change after development has started means rework in code, not a move in Figma. A clickable prototype of the key flow in the first sprint lets you and your users judge the direction while changes are still cheap.

• Decisions without users

  Opinions inside the team replace evidence. We test the prototype with a few real users of the product and let what they do, not what they say they prefer, settle the argument.

The same team can start with a UX audit if you already have a product and are not sure how much of it needs redesign.

• 

  Fitblast: AI fitness mobile app

  A fitness coaching platform designed as a scalable SaaS product: a mobile app and a web admin dashboard. End-to-end UX and UI, user flows, information architecture, wireframes, high-fidelity UI and a structured design system in Figma.

  View on BehanceRead the case

• 

  Nexora: team task management

  End-to-end UX and UI for a cross-platform task management app on iOS and Android: information architecture, user flows, wireframes, high-fidelity UI and a design system in Figma with reusable components for developer handoff.

  View on BehanceRead the case

• 

  Citizen Portal: government online services

  A web platform where residents handle municipal services online: a landing page that explains the service, a simple sign-up and login flow and an organized dashboard, designed in Figma and Illustrator.

  View on BehanceRead the case